“MASSA” OBAMA “NOT SURPRISED” HIS FAMILY OWNED SLAVES
FROM BILL CLINTON’S “I SHARE YOUR PAIN” TO BARACK OBAMA’S “YOU SHARE MY SHAME.”
FROM THE DEMOCRATS’ “MARCH TO MONTGOMERY (1965)” TO THE DEMOCRATS” “MARCH TO HYPOCRISY (2007)”
CLINTON WON’T APOLOGIZE FOR HER IRAQ VOTE; OBAMA WON’T APOLOGIZE FOR HIS FAMILY’S OWNERSHIP OF SLAVES
AND--MORE LIES FROM THE O-MAN AS THE “MYTH OF DADDY” PERSISTS
OBAMA CONTINUES TO “SPIN” A FICTITIOUS AND FARCICAL FAMILY HISTORY.
(CHICAGO)(March 4, 2007) Barack Obama, whose white Confederate Army ancestors owned slaves, will not apologize for that family history. “That’s no surprise,” Obama said, suggesting he knew he came from a slave-owning past. Instead of saying it was a tragic burden for him, he sought to swaddle himself in collective guilt by saying “That’s part of our tortured tangled, history.” Wrong.
Mr. Obama, my family did not own slaves. Yours did. Most Americans’ have no family links to slavery. Yours does. Yours, not ours.
Bill Clinton wanted to “share our pain.” You want us to “share your shame.” No thanks. Speak for yourself, Barry. That’s part of your incredibly tortured family history, and your own tortured psyche, not “ours.”
Amazingly, it took the exposure of his slave-owning family history for Obama to even acknowledge that half of his family history came from white racists who waged war against the United States.
And Obama wants “African-Americans” to support his candidacy? His ancestors sought to continue enslaving legitimate African-Americans. Massa Obama. You are the living embodiment of chutzpah. Just ask your friends at AIPAC what that means.
Truly, what part of Obama is “African-American?” His Kenyan father’s part, coming from the drunken polygamist that he continues to romanticize, or his white relatives’ slave ownership? It’s enough to make Hillary’s mouth water. And most people vomit.
Obama’s imagination and prevarication was in overdrive Sunday in Selma, where he now credits the civil rights movement for his sleazy father’s arrival in the United States and bigamous seduction of an innocent and very gullible 18 year-old woman. Obama was quoted as saying his father left “goat-herding” in Kenya—with a wife and child—to come to America where he impregnated his “Kansan” “wife” in Hawaii. It is truly sad the way Obama romanticizes the rascal and racial predator who was his father.
If only Barry would read his own book he would find out that he is lying about his “goat-herding father.” Barry senior came from a prosperous and educated family; he came to America to get out of Kenya during the war of independence after his links to the murderous Mau Mau led to his arrest. He left behind a wife and child in Kenya, and then took Obama’s mother as a “wife” in Hawaii before abandoning mother and child and running off to Harvard, where he met his eventual third wife and sired the third of his four “families.” Whew.
Because of racism, most Americans know little of the African-American community in our midst. African-Americans as a group are socially conservative, church-going people. They are family people. Why would they want someone who covers-up a family history of polygamy and alcoholism, and who can’t deal with the reality of his slave-owning family history, to be their leader? Beats me.
Especially when Hillary Clinton was hoopin’ and hollerin’ like a holy roller on Sunday. All she was missing was a snake and maybe a little talking in tongues. Come to think of it…
Maybe Obama really needs Clinton after all. Bill could share his pain. It must be painful to run away from the truth, and try to confuse and ultimately lie to the American people and hope to get away with it.
Barry Obama is a decent human being. He was victimized by his mother, who created a completely false fantasyland portrait of the father who abandoned him, and he was victimized by his own family history when he discovered he had been sired by a womanizing, alcoholic polygamist and racial huckster. And he was victimized when he learned the people who really raised him, his grandparents, came from a slave-owning clan in the south. That’s a trifecta of shame. Yours, not ours.
The Democrats took the March to Montgomery of 1965 and converted the event into a March to Hypocrisy in 2007. Walking alongside Bill Clinton in Selma was Al Sharpton. Is Sharpton really that essential to the Clinton effort to retain Black political support? Apparently so. I for one would not be comfortable with Al Sharpton in the White House. Of course maybe the Clintons should remember what happened to the last prominent political figure that had Sharpton at his side: Ned Lamont lost a “can’t lose” race for U. S. Senate after Sharpton appeared at his primary election victory celebration.
Recently I was attacked by a pro-Obama, tax-exempt left-wing smear machine that has been set up by the Democrats to attack conservatives (more on that later in the week). Yes, Democrats too use taxpayer-supported smear organizations to attack Republicans. They must be afraid of Andy Martin if they have been digging up dirt to throw at me. They can’t face the truth. But they have a problem. My facts about Obama will stand up, and their smears against me won’t.
The reality is that Barack Obama is all surface and no substance. He has lived his entire life in a fantasy world. He can’t accept who he is and where he comes from, so he keeps running away from the truth. I’m not against him because his Black father was a polygamist or because his White relatives were slave holders. Obviously, we don’t pick our relatives. It would be unfair to attack him on that basis.
I am critical of Obama because he continues to lie about his relatives and, when confronted with the truth, unleashes his left-wing smear machine to defend him by making personal attacks on legitimate conservative journalism. If Obama would only admit who is father was, and apologize for lying and living in a delusional world for 46 years, I would respect him more. If he would just admit that his white relatives were slave owners, and he is embarrassed by the fact, I would respect him more. I can’t respect him for lying. That’s the basis of my opposition.
I do not see how we can seriously consider placing someone in the oval office that lives in a dream world and who cannot even deal with the reality of his family history. And, no, I do not believe the American people want to “share his shame” any more than they believed Bill Clinton was “sharing our pain.” Most of us did not have relatives who owned slaves and we have no reason to apologize. I can’t see how African-Americans would vote for a man for president whose ancestors had enslaved them. But then wonders never cease.
Finally, Obama is the obvious beneficiary of “affirmative action” by the news media. They have not reported the truth about his family history. There has been a conscious cover-up to keep him “viable” as a candidate. Obama profits from a media cover-up that “enables” him to keep living a lie and selling a lie to the American people. What would happen if a newspaper discovered slave ownership in Hillary Clinton’s family history? You got it.
Hillary, apologize for your Iraq vote; Barry, tell the truth about your ancestors. Instead of saying “let the conversation begin,” why not say, both of you, “Let the truth-telling begin? We have been living a lie. Let’s start telling the truth.”
COMING MONDAY, MARCH 5TH: OBAMA + THREE WEEKS
------------------------------------------
Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin is the Executive Editor and publisher of ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2007. Martin covers national and world politics with forty years of personal experience. Columns also posted at politicalgateway.com; ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Comments? E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com. Media contact: (866) 706-2639.
FROM BILL CLINTON’S “I SHARE YOUR PAIN” TO BARACK OBAMA’S “YOU SHARE MY SHAME.”
FROM THE DEMOCRATS’ “MARCH TO MONTGOMERY (1965)” TO THE DEMOCRATS” “MARCH TO HYPOCRISY (2007)”
CLINTON WON’T APOLOGIZE FOR HER IRAQ VOTE; OBAMA WON’T APOLOGIZE FOR HIS FAMILY’S OWNERSHIP OF SLAVES
AND--MORE LIES FROM THE O-MAN AS THE “MYTH OF DADDY” PERSISTS
OBAMA CONTINUES TO “SPIN” A FICTITIOUS AND FARCICAL FAMILY HISTORY.
(CHICAGO)(March 4, 2007) Barack Obama, whose white Confederate Army ancestors owned slaves, will not apologize for that family history. “That’s no surprise,” Obama said, suggesting he knew he came from a slave-owning past. Instead of saying it was a tragic burden for him, he sought to swaddle himself in collective guilt by saying “That’s part of our tortured tangled, history.” Wrong.
Mr. Obama, my family did not own slaves. Yours did. Most Americans’ have no family links to slavery. Yours does. Yours, not ours.
Bill Clinton wanted to “share our pain.” You want us to “share your shame.” No thanks. Speak for yourself, Barry. That’s part of your incredibly tortured family history, and your own tortured psyche, not “ours.”
Amazingly, it took the exposure of his slave-owning family history for Obama to even acknowledge that half of his family history came from white racists who waged war against the United States.
And Obama wants “African-Americans” to support his candidacy? His ancestors sought to continue enslaving legitimate African-Americans. Massa Obama. You are the living embodiment of chutzpah. Just ask your friends at AIPAC what that means.
Truly, what part of Obama is “African-American?” His Kenyan father’s part, coming from the drunken polygamist that he continues to romanticize, or his white relatives’ slave ownership? It’s enough to make Hillary’s mouth water. And most people vomit.
Obama’s imagination and prevarication was in overdrive Sunday in Selma, where he now credits the civil rights movement for his sleazy father’s arrival in the United States and bigamous seduction of an innocent and very gullible 18 year-old woman. Obama was quoted as saying his father left “goat-herding” in Kenya—with a wife and child—to come to America where he impregnated his “Kansan” “wife” in Hawaii. It is truly sad the way Obama romanticizes the rascal and racial predator who was his father.
If only Barry would read his own book he would find out that he is lying about his “goat-herding father.” Barry senior came from a prosperous and educated family; he came to America to get out of Kenya during the war of independence after his links to the murderous Mau Mau led to his arrest. He left behind a wife and child in Kenya, and then took Obama’s mother as a “wife” in Hawaii before abandoning mother and child and running off to Harvard, where he met his eventual third wife and sired the third of his four “families.” Whew.
Because of racism, most Americans know little of the African-American community in our midst. African-Americans as a group are socially conservative, church-going people. They are family people. Why would they want someone who covers-up a family history of polygamy and alcoholism, and who can’t deal with the reality of his slave-owning family history, to be their leader? Beats me.
Especially when Hillary Clinton was hoopin’ and hollerin’ like a holy roller on Sunday. All she was missing was a snake and maybe a little talking in tongues. Come to think of it…
Maybe Obama really needs Clinton after all. Bill could share his pain. It must be painful to run away from the truth, and try to confuse and ultimately lie to the American people and hope to get away with it.
Barry Obama is a decent human being. He was victimized by his mother, who created a completely false fantasyland portrait of the father who abandoned him, and he was victimized by his own family history when he discovered he had been sired by a womanizing, alcoholic polygamist and racial huckster. And he was victimized when he learned the people who really raised him, his grandparents, came from a slave-owning clan in the south. That’s a trifecta of shame. Yours, not ours.
The Democrats took the March to Montgomery of 1965 and converted the event into a March to Hypocrisy in 2007. Walking alongside Bill Clinton in Selma was Al Sharpton. Is Sharpton really that essential to the Clinton effort to retain Black political support? Apparently so. I for one would not be comfortable with Al Sharpton in the White House. Of course maybe the Clintons should remember what happened to the last prominent political figure that had Sharpton at his side: Ned Lamont lost a “can’t lose” race for U. S. Senate after Sharpton appeared at his primary election victory celebration.
Recently I was attacked by a pro-Obama, tax-exempt left-wing smear machine that has been set up by the Democrats to attack conservatives (more on that later in the week). Yes, Democrats too use taxpayer-supported smear organizations to attack Republicans. They must be afraid of Andy Martin if they have been digging up dirt to throw at me. They can’t face the truth. But they have a problem. My facts about Obama will stand up, and their smears against me won’t.
The reality is that Barack Obama is all surface and no substance. He has lived his entire life in a fantasy world. He can’t accept who he is and where he comes from, so he keeps running away from the truth. I’m not against him because his Black father was a polygamist or because his White relatives were slave holders. Obviously, we don’t pick our relatives. It would be unfair to attack him on that basis.
I am critical of Obama because he continues to lie about his relatives and, when confronted with the truth, unleashes his left-wing smear machine to defend him by making personal attacks on legitimate conservative journalism. If Obama would only admit who is father was, and apologize for lying and living in a delusional world for 46 years, I would respect him more. If he would just admit that his white relatives were slave owners, and he is embarrassed by the fact, I would respect him more. I can’t respect him for lying. That’s the basis of my opposition.
I do not see how we can seriously consider placing someone in the oval office that lives in a dream world and who cannot even deal with the reality of his family history. And, no, I do not believe the American people want to “share his shame” any more than they believed Bill Clinton was “sharing our pain.” Most of us did not have relatives who owned slaves and we have no reason to apologize. I can’t see how African-Americans would vote for a man for president whose ancestors had enslaved them. But then wonders never cease.
Finally, Obama is the obvious beneficiary of “affirmative action” by the news media. They have not reported the truth about his family history. There has been a conscious cover-up to keep him “viable” as a candidate. Obama profits from a media cover-up that “enables” him to keep living a lie and selling a lie to the American people. What would happen if a newspaper discovered slave ownership in Hillary Clinton’s family history? You got it.
Hillary, apologize for your Iraq vote; Barry, tell the truth about your ancestors. Instead of saying “let the conversation begin,” why not say, both of you, “Let the truth-telling begin? We have been living a lie. Let’s start telling the truth.”
COMING MONDAY, MARCH 5TH: OBAMA + THREE WEEKS
------------------------------------------
Chicago-based Internet journalist, broadcaster and critic Andy Martin is the Executive Editor and publisher of ContrarianCommentary.com. © Copyright by Andy Martin 2007. Martin covers national and world politics with forty years of personal experience. Columns also posted at politicalgateway.com; ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com. Comments? E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com. Media contact: (866) 706-2639.
posted by Andy Martin | 11:29 PM
1 Comments:
Virtually all Americans are related to people who owned slaves. Makes no difference which side of the Mason-Dixie line your family is from. Slavery was legal in all the Northern states prior to the Civil War and still legal in many of the Nothern states during the Civil War. African Americans who reasearch thier family trees are likely to discover they have black as well as white ancestors who owned slaves. Free blacks as well as whites owned slaves in the United States. One of the South's biggest slave owners was a free black man who was notorious for his harsh treatment of slaves. Americans Indians also owned slaves, but it appears they don't feel especially guilty. The Cherokees voted this past weekend to exclude the descendants of Cherokee slaves from the tribal rolls.
Post a Comment
<< Home