Andy Martin: Homosexual Mark Kirk Endorses Lesbian Elena Kagan
Andy Martin explains why Congressman Mark Kirk went out of his way to “endorse” Elena Kagan for the U. S. Supreme Court
Internet powerhouse Andy Martin explains Mark Kirk’s “endorsement” of Elena Kagan to the U. S. Supreme Court
Martin says that Barack Obama nominates dysfunctional women to high office: why? Because they mirror his disturbed mother’s personality and appearance
ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor
“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Andy Martin says that the homosexual “beat down” of Mark Kirk for opposing repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (“DADT”) made Kirk pander to the gay lobby by supporting Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court
Martin says Illinoisans got a bird’s eye view of what Illinoisans can expect in the way of homosexual blackmail if Kirk is actually elected to the Senate
Martin says Kirk should come out of the closet and stop lying to Illinois voters
Martin says that Obama has apparently put two lesbian women on the Supreme Court; what does that say about Obama and his troubled mother’s life?
(CHICAGO)(July 25, 2010) I am not pro-homosexual or anti-homosexual. And, yes, I have “gay” friends. That’s my right. Every human being has a right to respect, whatever their sexual orientation in private.
Americans have a history of being uncomfortable talking about sex and the psyche. We love to believe our own lies or, as human impersonator Mark Kirk so elegantly put it, we like to “misremember” who and what we are.
But when it comes to electing individuals to national office who will make life and death decisions about the future of this great nation, we cannot be too “embarrassed” to probe the personality structures of the people who are prancing about on the political stage. There is no right to privacy in public office.
Barack Obama and Mark Kirk are two disturbed individuals. One has already endangered our nation and our national security.
Mark Kirk could assist Obama in undermining America if Illinois voters are stupid enough to elect him.
During the 2010 primary election I told voters the truth about Mark Kirk. I didn't just “tell” voters the truth, I broadcast it on the radio and TV all across the state. You couldn’t miss the truth. Millions of Illinoisans heard the messages.
But voters would now prefer to “misremember” my earlier warnings. The little monster, or “Little Critter” as I called Kirk, has turned out to be everything I said he was, and worse. Unlike the woman who recently couldn’t handle her adopted Russian child, we can’t put Kirk on a plane back to Moscow and be rid of him. Kirk is a serious threat to Republicans, and to every American.
If Kirk joins the equally disturbed and emotionally dysfunctional Barack Obama, together these men pose a mortal danger to America’s security.
Mark Kirk wants to become the first homosexual president. That is why he refuses to admit he is gay and why he married a pro-lesbian activist as his “wife.” Oh, her. Kirk married a “wife” who never lived with him, never lived in Illinois, and claimed Virginia was her state of residence when she filed for divorce against the Little Critter. A nice pair together.
If we pretend that our private sexual orientation has no bearing on our public behavior we deceive ourselves. I have no problem with openly gay individuals. You can accept them or reject them on their own merits, as voters have done in many jurisdictions. I can respect voters’ decisions even if I disagree with them. Congressman Barney Frank may be obnoxious, but he is no hypocrite.
I do think there is a problem with closeted gays seeking public office. Remaining closeted is a public confession of private dysfunction, confusion and deception. With these comments we turn to Kirk and Elena Kagan, another apparently closeted and dysfunctional woman.
When I disclosed the “rumors” about Mark Kirk’s homosexuality on December 28, 2009, Chicago media attacked me. Of course everyone knew I was telling the truth. They just didn’t want to hear the truth. And not on the airwaves. Politics is a “pretend” business everywhere, but especially so in Illinois. Chicago’s newspapers went on to repeatedly describe Kirk as a valiant “war hero.” He won the primary based on the false persona that the media projected. And now Illinois voters are stuck with Kirk the military masquerader, a man with serious psychological problems. Kirk the war hero has dissolved into Kirk the deeply troubled individual whose entire life is a lie.
In May Kirk went a step too far with his deception and delusion. He thought he could pander to conservatives by voting against the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (‘DADT’).” Gays had given Kirk a pass when he denied his homosexuality after my radio ads. But they were not prepared to accept a second betrayal. Kirk was promptly exposed as a closeted gay man:
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/
2010/06/01/Mike_Rogers_Targets_Rep_Mark_Kirk/
http://blog.blogactive.com/2010/06/
truth-or-consequences.html
What Kirk did not expect is that as the pieces of his secret life came together, a very different personality would emerge than the one previously promoted by the media. Here are the facts in context.
Kirk had claimed, for example, to be a teacher. He wasn’t of course. That was another lie. But it is significant that Kirk-the-college-student constantly wanted to be around children. He did the same thing in London, where homosexuality is much more tolerated.
Kirk also helped to cover up the pedophilia of Mark Foley, a fellow congressman who was preying on adolescent boys employed as “pages” by the House of Representatives. Do you see an emerging picture? Kirk and Foley were a pair; they in turn were connected to homosexual John McGovern who worked in the notoriously homosexual offices of House Speaker Dennis Hastert.
Gays said “enough.” If Kirk could vote against DADT, Kirk couldn’t be trusted. He was promptly “outed” by Mike Rogers as a man who “cruised” for homosexual hookups and had openly admitted his homosexuality. (We have more, if you want more.)
Since May, Kirk has been looking for a way to ingratiate himself with gays. He found it in closeted lesbian Elena Kagan.
I believe everyone has a right to privacy, and that Elena Kagan has that right as a private citizen. But when Kagan wants to be appointed to the nation’s highest court, where homosexuals are about to storm the gates and demand “equality,” then I do not believe Kagan has a right to keep her own private life secret.
When Sonia Sotomayor was appointed to the Supreme court I exposed her secret reputation as a lesbian. In the case of Sotomayor I had inside information about her from within the Second Circuit Court of Appeals where she was a judge. I do not have any inside information about Kagan. Just research. But it would be straining credulity and ignoring reality not to look at Kagan's bizarre life style and to ignore the signs she is a closeted gay woman.
Why has Obama apportioned two closeted gay women to the high court? Why no Democratic version of Sandra O’Connor with a husband and family? Because Barack Obama is virulently anti-family. Obama’s “family” life was profoundly unhappy and disorienting, as even he admitted in his possibly ghost-written fictional “autobiographies.”
His mother dumped him, and he grew up in a loving but somewhat peculiar Hawaiian family. He grew up bitter and harboring racial resentments that he has managed to successfully control in public.
When the issue of “marriage equality,” which is a perfectly ludicrous propaganda concept, comes before the Supreme Court, Barack Obama’s two closeted gay women will vote to destroy families and marriage. You won’t be able to say I didn’t warn you. Any Republican who votes for Kagan is voting to destroy America’s social values. It’s that clear.
Ask yourself, if Kagan is a straight normal woman who just “let herself go” in middle age, why are homosexuals lobbying so hard for her to be on the Supreme Court? Just remember: homosexuals know who they are. They knew who Kirk was, as they later admitted after the primary. And they know Kagan. The canary in the mine shaft is “tweeting.”
Mark Kirk didn’t have to express an opinion on Elena Kagan. He’s not yet in the senate. But he went out of his way to cast a “vote” for Kagan to appease the homosexual lobby and to buy his way back into the good graces of that powerful Democratic Party interest group. Nuf said.
If you still think Kirk is straight, facts obviously have no impact on your reasoning and reality.
And any Illinoisan who votes for Mark Kirk is voting to place a deeply troubled, emotionally disturbed and disoriented homosexual man in the U. S. Senate. Don’t try to “misremember” your role in this political tragedy if you vote for Kirk and he is later exposed for what he is. I told you so.
Barack Obama and Mark Kirk, perfect together. Which was another one of my radio ads.
-------------------------------------
ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin is the legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He promotes his best-selling book, “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” and his Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai'i years." Martin has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois for over forty years. He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com
Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of investigative and overseas experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).
UPDATES: www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSAwww.facebook.com/AndyMartin Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com.
contrariancommentary.typepad.com[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in this story on our blogs; find our latest edition there.]
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com © Copyright by Andy Martin 2010
Andy Martin explains why Congressman Mark Kirk went out of his way to “endorse” Elena Kagan for the U. S. Supreme Court
Internet powerhouse Andy Martin explains Mark Kirk’s “endorsement” of Elena Kagan to the U. S. Supreme Court
Martin says that Barack Obama nominates dysfunctional women to high office: why? Because they mirror his disturbed mother’s personality and appearance
ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor
“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Andy Martin says that the homosexual “beat down” of Mark Kirk for opposing repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (“DADT”) made Kirk pander to the gay lobby by supporting Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court
Martin says Illinoisans got a bird’s eye view of what Illinoisans can expect in the way of homosexual blackmail if Kirk is actually elected to the Senate
Martin says Kirk should come out of the closet and stop lying to Illinois voters
Martin says that Obama has apparently put two lesbian women on the Supreme Court; what does that say about Obama and his troubled mother’s life?
(CHICAGO)(July 25, 2010) I am not pro-homosexual or anti-homosexual. And, yes, I have “gay” friends. That’s my right. Every human being has a right to respect, whatever their sexual orientation in private.
Americans have a history of being uncomfortable talking about sex and the psyche. We love to believe our own lies or, as human impersonator Mark Kirk so elegantly put it, we like to “misremember” who and what we are.
But when it comes to electing individuals to national office who will make life and death decisions about the future of this great nation, we cannot be too “embarrassed” to probe the personality structures of the people who are prancing about on the political stage. There is no right to privacy in public office.
Barack Obama and Mark Kirk are two disturbed individuals. One has already endangered our nation and our national security.
Mark Kirk could assist Obama in undermining America if Illinois voters are stupid enough to elect him.
During the 2010 primary election I told voters the truth about Mark Kirk. I didn't just “tell” voters the truth, I broadcast it on the radio and TV all across the state. You couldn’t miss the truth. Millions of Illinoisans heard the messages.
But voters would now prefer to “misremember” my earlier warnings. The little monster, or “Little Critter” as I called Kirk, has turned out to be everything I said he was, and worse. Unlike the woman who recently couldn’t handle her adopted Russian child, we can’t put Kirk on a plane back to Moscow and be rid of him. Kirk is a serious threat to Republicans, and to every American.
If Kirk joins the equally disturbed and emotionally dysfunctional Barack Obama, together these men pose a mortal danger to America’s security.
Mark Kirk wants to become the first homosexual president. That is why he refuses to admit he is gay and why he married a pro-lesbian activist as his “wife.” Oh, her. Kirk married a “wife” who never lived with him, never lived in Illinois, and claimed Virginia was her state of residence when she filed for divorce against the Little Critter. A nice pair together.
If we pretend that our private sexual orientation has no bearing on our public behavior we deceive ourselves. I have no problem with openly gay individuals. You can accept them or reject them on their own merits, as voters have done in many jurisdictions. I can respect voters’ decisions even if I disagree with them. Congressman Barney Frank may be obnoxious, but he is no hypocrite.
I do think there is a problem with closeted gays seeking public office. Remaining closeted is a public confession of private dysfunction, confusion and deception. With these comments we turn to Kirk and Elena Kagan, another apparently closeted and dysfunctional woman.
When I disclosed the “rumors” about Mark Kirk’s homosexuality on December 28, 2009, Chicago media attacked me. Of course everyone knew I was telling the truth. They just didn’t want to hear the truth. And not on the airwaves. Politics is a “pretend” business everywhere, but especially so in Illinois. Chicago’s newspapers went on to repeatedly describe Kirk as a valiant “war hero.” He won the primary based on the false persona that the media projected. And now Illinois voters are stuck with Kirk the military masquerader, a man with serious psychological problems. Kirk the war hero has dissolved into Kirk the deeply troubled individual whose entire life is a lie.
In May Kirk went a step too far with his deception and delusion. He thought he could pander to conservatives by voting against the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (‘DADT’).” Gays had given Kirk a pass when he denied his homosexuality after my radio ads. But they were not prepared to accept a second betrayal. Kirk was promptly exposed as a closeted gay man:
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/
2010/06/01/Mike_Rogers_Targets_Rep_Mark_Kirk/
http://blog.blogactive.com/2010/06/
truth-or-consequences.html
What Kirk did not expect is that as the pieces of his secret life came together, a very different personality would emerge than the one previously promoted by the media. Here are the facts in context.
Kirk had claimed, for example, to be a teacher. He wasn’t of course. That was another lie. But it is significant that Kirk-the-college-student constantly wanted to be around children. He did the same thing in London, where homosexuality is much more tolerated.
Kirk also helped to cover up the pedophilia of Mark Foley, a fellow congressman who was preying on adolescent boys employed as “pages” by the House of Representatives. Do you see an emerging picture? Kirk and Foley were a pair; they in turn were connected to homosexual John McGovern who worked in the notoriously homosexual offices of House Speaker Dennis Hastert.
Gays said “enough.” If Kirk could vote against DADT, Kirk couldn’t be trusted. He was promptly “outed” by Mike Rogers as a man who “cruised” for homosexual hookups and had openly admitted his homosexuality. (We have more, if you want more.)
Since May, Kirk has been looking for a way to ingratiate himself with gays. He found it in closeted lesbian Elena Kagan.
I believe everyone has a right to privacy, and that Elena Kagan has that right as a private citizen. But when Kagan wants to be appointed to the nation’s highest court, where homosexuals are about to storm the gates and demand “equality,” then I do not believe Kagan has a right to keep her own private life secret.
When Sonia Sotomayor was appointed to the Supreme court I exposed her secret reputation as a lesbian. In the case of Sotomayor I had inside information about her from within the Second Circuit Court of Appeals where she was a judge. I do not have any inside information about Kagan. Just research. But it would be straining credulity and ignoring reality not to look at Kagan's bizarre life style and to ignore the signs she is a closeted gay woman.
Why has Obama apportioned two closeted gay women to the high court? Why no Democratic version of Sandra O’Connor with a husband and family? Because Barack Obama is virulently anti-family. Obama’s “family” life was profoundly unhappy and disorienting, as even he admitted in his possibly ghost-written fictional “autobiographies.”
His mother dumped him, and he grew up in a loving but somewhat peculiar Hawaiian family. He grew up bitter and harboring racial resentments that he has managed to successfully control in public.
When the issue of “marriage equality,” which is a perfectly ludicrous propaganda concept, comes before the Supreme Court, Barack Obama’s two closeted gay women will vote to destroy families and marriage. You won’t be able to say I didn’t warn you. Any Republican who votes for Kagan is voting to destroy America’s social values. It’s that clear.
Ask yourself, if Kagan is a straight normal woman who just “let herself go” in middle age, why are homosexuals lobbying so hard for her to be on the Supreme Court? Just remember: homosexuals know who they are. They knew who Kirk was, as they later admitted after the primary. And they know Kagan. The canary in the mine shaft is “tweeting.”
Mark Kirk didn’t have to express an opinion on Elena Kagan. He’s not yet in the senate. But he went out of his way to cast a “vote” for Kagan to appease the homosexual lobby and to buy his way back into the good graces of that powerful Democratic Party interest group. Nuf said.
If you still think Kirk is straight, facts obviously have no impact on your reasoning and reality.
And any Illinoisan who votes for Mark Kirk is voting to place a deeply troubled, emotionally disturbed and disoriented homosexual man in the U. S. Senate. Don’t try to “misremember” your role in this political tragedy if you vote for Kirk and he is later exposed for what he is. I told you so.
Barack Obama and Mark Kirk, perfect together. Which was another one of my radio ads.
-------------------------------------
ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin is the legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He promotes his best-selling book, “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” and his Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai'i years." Martin has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois for over forty years. He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com
Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of investigative and overseas experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).
UPDATES: www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSAwww.facebook.com/AndyMartin Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com.
contrariancommentary.typepad.com[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in this story on our blogs; find our latest edition there.]
MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com © Copyright by Andy Martin 2010
Labels: Andy Martin, Elena Kagan, Illinois Republican Party, Jeremy Rose, Lee Roupas, Mark Kirk, Pat Brady, U S Supreme Court
posted by Andy Martin | 11:23 AM
|
0 comments
