Andy Martin: Obama is creating a new “homosexual Roe v. Wade” for Republicans and conservatives in November

Obama author, film producer and investigator Andy Martin says that President Obama’s imposition of gay rights on every American hospital will become the gift that keeps on giving for Republicans in the 2010 election. Obama is roiling the American people just as Martin, the Founding Father of anti-Obama movement, prepares to open a new investigation into Obama’s past in Honolulu.

Barack Obama is going to systematically and single-handedly demolish the Democratic party, Andy Martin predicts

“Liberal conservative” Andy Martin explains why personal beliefs should not always be imposed as public policy

ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Andy Martin explains how Barack Obama is deconstructing the Democratic Party and ensuring a Republican landslide in November

Martin says Obama has crated a “homosexual Roe v. Wade” by acting as a national dictator to impose gay rights on American hospitals

“Well, there he goes again” Andy says of Barry Obama, the man Andy has been exposing since 2004

Does anyone remember health reform? Or is gay rights a better topic for political debate?

(NEW YORK)(April 16, 2010) A quarter of a century ago I was studying at the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York to be a priest in the Episcopal Church. I knew one of my classmates causally. One day we learned he was ill at Lenox Hill Hospital. Another classmate and I went to pray with our ill brother.

I can’t remember the exact sign on the door, but it was some sort of intimidating warning, maybe with a bright red letter alert to enter carefully. He had AIDS.

It was a heart breaking experience to share my friend’s illness and grief. In the 1980’s, AIDS was a death sentence. Physicians did not understand the condition; ordinary people had even less comprehension.

My friend Adrian Dumont had been abandoned by his family. As we helped Adrian, my other friend and I died a little each day alongside him. We chose to share his fate because we could not allow him to die alone. My second friend, Paul, and I attended to Adrian’s legal needs. We had to protect Adrian’s rights, to be sure his home was still there for him, and we also attended to many other aspects of helping a dying colleague prepare for the inevitable.

Neither my personal morality nor my Christian beliefs would allow me to abandon someone in need, whether their affliction was AIDS or something else.

I still belong to the Episcopal Church, even as it becomes an increasingly loopy place to be because of an obsession with sexuality to the exclusion of Christianity. I have friends who are gay priests; I accept them because they both openly acknowledge their status and also understand the proper and practical role of limiting their personal actions in the theological environment.

I did leave one Episcopal parish when the rector went berserk and wanted to make his church a gay Mecca. That was too much for me. The rector’s gay politics quickly overshadowed the Christianity of the place.

Over the years my attitudes on homosexuality have evolved. Based on my experiences ministering to Adrian Dumont I think my views on how we should treat human beings are actually close to President Obama’s. I believe gay couples have a right to the same treatment as others in the medical/hospital context.

In the conflict between homosexuality and religion, Christ tugs at both of our sleeves. Some Christians strongly believe Christ condemns homosexuality in every aspect of its existence. But Christ also teaches love and forgiveness. Correlating and rationalizing these two competing views is not always easy.

But the fact that my views on voluntary and private treatment of homosexual couples in the medical context would qualify as “liberal” does not mean that I am not a Republican, and a conservative Republican where many aspects of public policy and politics are concerned. I recognize and respect the inevitable and necessary disconnect between personal views and politics, between my own opinions and their imposition on everyone as public policy.

I have no problem with Representative Barney Frank. He is open about his sexuality. You can take him or leave him as you please.

But I also did not have a problem earlier this year exposing the virtually unanimous belief of Illinois Republican leaders and media that U. S. Senate candidate Mark Kirk is a closeted homosexual. Closeting in the public arena raises deeply challenging issues. The liberal media and Kirk's fellow travelers in the gay-dominated Illinois Republican Party apparatus attacked me for raising legitimate questions about Kirk. I merely pointed out that almost everyone in the media and in political leadership believed Kirk is gay; you could find the tapes on the Internet (and still can). Voters had a right to the same information as party insiders.

So where do I come out? It depends on the issue. Closeted gays that want to run for high office? I have a problem with that. People need to be honest with themselves and with the public if they want to accept a public trust. But on human and humane issues I come down on the side of trying to treat every human being with love and dignity. I have Adrian Dumont looking over my shoulder.

This long preface has been necessary because having said I essentially agree with President Obama on how homosexuals should be treated by hospitals, I completely disagree with him on his latest imperial diktat to impose gay rights on every hospital in the nation through an order emanating from the court of the Emperor Obama I.

One of the things we see as we look back into the 1970’s is that states were gradually liberalizing their abortion polices. In fact, in some states Republicans, including Governor Ronald Reagan, accepted liberalized abortion procedures. But the imperial diktat issued by the U. S. Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade created a backlash that is still burning.

A few days ago Democrats were breathing a sigh of relief; they thought they were going to be able to campaign on "health care reform." Obama has now erased the "health" issue. Obama’s “order” for “gay rights in hospitals” is going to become a defining issue and the latest evidence of his overwhelming and overweening arrogance as a leader. Because the Emperor Obama cannot remember the past, Democrats are doomed to repeat it. The imposition of gay rights on hospitals, however praiseworthy in concept, and however reasonable as a policy that hospitals should adopt, is going to create a firestorm that dooms even more representatives and senators as Obama martyrs.

In my book, “Obama: The Man Behind the Mask,” I explained in a psychological profile why Obama is not a leader. He is a weathervane. His only fixed reference point is a colossal personal ego that competes with the sun for radiation and reflection. But he is rapidly becoming the sworn enemy of the American people. His efforts to impose imperial law on every nook and cranny of this nation reflect an insufferable arrogance that is going to demolish his party in November:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/
content/article/2010/04/15/
AR2010041505502.html?hpid=topnews

Is gay rights for hospitals an urgent national issue? Not by a mile. But Obama is obsessed with grand gestures and imposing visible manifestations of his role as a Hugo Chavez-style national dictator.

So what is the lesson of Roe v. Wade? The lesson is that when people are allowed to make changes, even slowly, even incrementally, those changes acquire democratic legitimacy. The changes become a foundation for future change. When government imposes social policy by executive or judicial fiat, we create just another “culture war” to be continued endlessly at the ballot box.

Obama says that any hospital that takes “federal funds” must bow to his imperial edicts. If that is indeed the law since all of us receive “federal funds” in some form or fashion, we must all now bow down to the “laws” of the Emperor Obama. We are no longer citizens. Obama has declared by decree that we are his subjects. Over the past several decades, the “federal funds means federal control” doctrine has been expanded and expanded by Congress and the Supreme Court. Obama just pricked their balloon. The counterrevolution is about to begin.

Ordinary people don’t like to debate gay rights openly. Gay activists are noisy and obnoxious about seeking to intimidate opponents and imposing their views on the general community. But I can say without fear of contradiction that Obama has now created a “homosexual Roe v. Wade” conflict that is going to doom more Democrats in November. The American people don’t want to be dictated to by Barry Obama, the man without a birth certificate, even on issues where they might agree with him on principle.

Obama has created another monsoon issue for Democrats, and another gift for Republicans and conservatives. Ironically, Obama is actually hurting the progress of gay acceptance. The backlash is going to blow up in his face.

The other ultimate irony in all of this is that Obama is doing much, much more to defeat Democrats than the Republicans could ever accomplish on their own. Of course, I warned that this would happen way back in 2008; check out the 2008 Hannity video and my 2009 movie in Honolulu:

http://www.StopObamaCoalition.com/

www.CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com

After watching my video predictions on Hannity and my ongoing media efforts to delve into the mysterious and deleterious Mr. Obama, you too can join the anti-Obama evolution!

And, hey, make a contribution to support funding for our research in Hawai’i and elsewhere. You may be paying the Emperor Obama’s light bill, but we still have to pay for our own electricity. Enough said.

-----------------------------
URGENT APPEAL: The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama raises money to oppose President Barack Obama's radical agenda and also to support www.BoycottHawaii.com. www.CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com
Please give generously. Our ability to fight and defeat Barack Obama's political agenda is directly dependent on the generosity of every American. “The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama has no bundlers, no fat cats and no illegal contributions. Obama is opposed to almost everything America stands for," says Executive Director Andy Martin. "But while Obama has raised a billion dollar slush fund, his opponents lack sufficient resources. Americans can either contribute now, or pay later. If we do not succeed, Obama will."
------------------------------
Readers of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, say the book is still the only gold standard and practical handbook on Barack Obama's unfitness for the presidency. Buy it. Book orders: Amazon.com or OrangeStatePress.com. Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies (delayed for signing) from the publisher are available.
------------------------------
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He is currently promoting his best-selling book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask and promoting his new Internet movie “Obama: The Hawai’i years.” Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Martin comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York.

UPDATES:
www.Twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

His columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com.
[NOTE: We try to correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this column.]

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com
© Copyright by Andy Martin 2010

Andy Martin threatens State of Hawai’i with new lawsuit over Obama secrecy

Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin says that the Hawai’i Attorney General’s attitude towards freedom of information involving Obama’s records is “insulting to the intelligence.” Martin is fundraising to support a new investigation in Honolulu beginning April 27th.

CONTRARIANCOMMENTARY.COM
Independent Worldwide News and Opinion
New York-London-Washington-Chicago-San Francisco-Palm Beach

Headquarters mail:
Post Office Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Tel. (866) 706-2639
Fax (866) 707-2639
Web: ContrarianCommentary.com
E-mail: AndyMart20@aol.com

Anthony R. Martin, J. D.
Executive Editor

April 14, 2010

Hon. Russell A Suzuki
Deputy Attorney general
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, HI 96813-2903
via fax (808) 586-1239


Re: UIPA documents letter of May 28, 2009

Dear Mr. Suzuki:

This will reply to your UIPA letter to me of May 29, 2009 which I recently had the opportunity to review. As a convenience, I have appended a copy of your letter to me to the faxed version of this letter. I did not include the Privilege Log itself.

Your office charged $600 to deliver a package of materials that were virtually useless and contained no information whatsoever involving Hawai’i inter-agency attempts to cover-up the release of Barack Obama’s original 1961 birth certificate

We have always tried to resolve our differences in a reasonable manner, and I will continue to do so. But if we do not resolve my objections to your letter by the close of business on Monday, April 26th, I will file suit later that week in Honolulu. I am flying to Honolulu on April 27th because I expect that we need to file a lawsuit to break the circle of corruption in Hawai’i government.

I was apparently the first person to seek access to what is now undeniably a prime document in American history, namely the original 1961 typewritten birth certificate of Barack Obama. Both I and persons who have followed after me have been met with an impenetrable stone wall of secrecy and prevarication, with one notable exception: Chiyome Fukino has repeatedly issued press releases and sought public attention for her claims she has seen this document and vouches for it. She sought to bolster Obama on the eve of the 2008 election, which is irrefutable evidence that your office and Fukino & Co. are politically biased in administering the UIPA.

I don't know what you are hiding, but you are hiding something. Nearly half of the American people now believe Obama is hiding the truth. You are on the losing side of history. The State of Hawai’i increasingly appears as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Obama, Inc. instead of as an independent state government.

With these prefatory comments I will move to a substantive response to your letter.

1. HRS 92F-13 (3)

For you to suggest that a statute concerning “frustration of a legitimate government function” has anything to do with this dispute is, frankly, an insult to my intelligence and an insult to the American people. While I enjoy the colorful displays of ancient Hawaiian culture on my trips to Hawai’i, Hawai’i is not a kingdom, or an independent nation. Hawai’i is one of the fifty states and bears a responsibility and relationship to each of the other 49 states and to every American. That principle arises out of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the U.S. Constitution. So please do not insult me by suggesting that efforts to obtain access to an ancient document almost fifty years old involving the president of the United States in any way “frustrates” the functioning of the state government of Hawai’i. That kind of claim makes you look bad and makes the state look worse.

2. Executive privilege

Executive privilege has nothing to do with the state’s response to efforts by American citizens to obtain access to a prime document of American history. Quite by accident, the president of the United States claims to have been born in Hawai’i. His original, typewritten 1961 certificate is by any standard of law an ancient and archival document. In no way do efforts to obtain access to that document, or to the records of responses by Hawai’i officials to the public’s efforts to obtain access, constitute any sort of significant executive action.

Executive privilege was designed to protect genuinely critical decisions concerning current governmental matters, not to act as a roadblock to access to historic public records. The federal cases you cite concerned substantial policies concerning current government functions, not responses by government officials to ministerial requests for access to ancient historic records.

3. Attorney-client privilege

A. Who do you claim is the client?

It would seem to me that in your theme of analysis, the governor would be the client (though I deny that there is in fact a “client” exception for UIPA purposes) if anyone wanted to concoct a client for invocation of the attorney-client privilege. Under the attorney-client privilege, the client, not the attorney, invokes the privilege. Has Governor Lingle invoked the privilege? Does she even know you have invoked the privilege on her behalf? We need to know. There is no evidence your putative client has invoked the privilege, notwithstanding my belief that the “client” in this case is the people, not public officials.

B. The attorney-client privilege has no applicability

There is a good reason why, as you candidly concede, there is no attorney-client privilege jurisprudence in Hawai’i concerning the UIPA. The privilege does not apply to communications between government officials on matters not touching a substantial public concern. Moreover, the AG cannot assert the privilege for the governor, and the governor is not the holder of the privilege, the people are. That principle applies a fortiori where we are dealing with records of attempts to obtain public access to a historical document.

I would also point out that the UIPA is much broader than the federal Freedom of Information Act.

After reading your letter I did extensive research and also took a look at Florida case law. The Florida Supreme court considered an analogous claim, see City v. Miami Herald, 468 So.2d 218 (Fla. 1985)(no privilege in the absence of a clear legislative decision to create one) and Neu v. Miami Herald, 462 So.2d 821 (Fla. 1985)(the “evidence code” privilege does not trump the open government laws). Florida case law is significant because Florida’s policy of open records is virtually identical to Hawaii’s.

In sum and substance, there is no attorney-client privilege between Hawai’i government officials as a basis to suppress either ancient documents or to suppress responses to current efforts to obtain public access to ancient Hawaiian state archives.

C. The crime-fraud exception applies to my efforts

There has recently been a firestorm over efforts by Kenyan officials to claim Barack Obama was born in Kenya. Michelle Obama recently claimed Kenya is Obama’s “home country.” In other words, both the Obamas and Kenyan officials are casting a cloud over Hawaii’s claims that Obama was born in Hawai’i. There could be a crime/fraud in progress, cf. State v. Wong, 97 Hawai’i 512, 40 P.3rd 914 (Hawai’i 2002). Historians and writers have a vital interest in examining Hawaii’s original documents to see just what the 1961 record says, and what state officials have said internally since 2008 when the birth certificate issue mushroomed after my ContrarianCommentary.com columns.

4. Other factors

There are other factors which bear on the ultimate resolution of release of the records for which you are claiming secrecy.
A. Waiver

(1) Fukino waiver

Ms. Fukino has repeatedly sought personal and political publicity for her manipulation of the documents in question. Fukino’s conduct clearly waives any privilege (i) as to the document itself and (ii) as to Hawai’i government records concerning responses by state officials to efforts to obtain access to the document.

(2) Obama waiver

Barack Obama and his employees have repeatedly stated he has released his “birth certificate.” That being the case, you cannot invoke secrecy on his behalf. He has waived any secrecy or privacy. Moreover the privacy/secrecy right of an executive official to control the release of historical documents is very limited, indeed, see e.g. Nixon v. Administrator, 433 US. 425, 97 S. Ct. 2777 (1977); U. S. v. Nixon, 418 U. S. 683, 04 S. Ct. 3090 (1974).

B. Constitutional legitimacy

Where bona fide questions have been raised concerning the constitutional eligibility of a person to serve as president, researchers/historians obviously seek to review the original documents to see what they say and how they look. (Please note that while I keep referring to "original documents," my claims extend as well to any documents generated in response to requests for access, which form the bulk of your privilege claims.) The 1961 birth certificate contains considerable detail that can cast light on Obama’s claims he was born in Hawai’i, particularly when Michelle Obama claims his “home” was somewhere else and Kenyan officials have reported he was born in Kenya.

C. The adverse inference rule in civil law

The 1961 birth certificate is a simple document. Why it has been concealed for so long, with so much legerdemain, mystifies me. Unless there is something that Obama and Hawai’i officials do not want the American people to know or see.

Henceforth I am going to apply the adverse inference rule to your efforts and Hawai’i’ s efforts to conceal Obama’s 1961 birth certificate, namely that the Court must draw an adverse inference from these rather shameless attempts at secrecy. While the Hawai’i Supreme Court had addressed the civil context of the adverse inference rule from a spoliation perspective, see Stender v. Vincent, 92 Hawai’i, 992 P.2d 50 (Hawai’i 2000), the same principles apply to the efforts of Fukino and her handlers to play cat-and-mouse with the 1961 document and to manipulate and control access in a politically motivated manner.

There are other miscellaneous issues with which I disagree. You removed phone numbers. If someone places a phone number in a public document, they intend for it to be public. No one writes to a public official believing they are engaging in a secret communication. The telephone redactions, as well as any others, are without legal or logical support. At a minimum there would have to be an invocation of secrecy by the initiating party, or you would have to contact them to invoke secrecy on that person’s behalf.

Conclusion

The American people are increasingly concerned that there is a constitutional usurper in the White House, and that voters were inveigled into voting for someone who was not eligible to hold the office of president. I have refrained to date from taking a position in that dispute because I have consistently maintained that we need to see the original birth certificate before we can make an informed decision on how the constitutional issues play out.

I have tried to avoid a UIPA lawsuit, and I waited patiently for six (6) months while you “processed” my request. Then you turned over 600 pages of nothing and asserted farcical defenses to the release of documents relating to public concerns about access to an ancient document.

With all due respect, my patience is at an end. Either you turn over the withheld documents, or we go to court to have a judge review your claims. Because I have decades of experience with an utterly corrupt judicial system in Chicago and Illinois, I am comfortable contending with the Hawai’i judiciary, which sometimes seen as though it is a sunshine-based carbon copy of the Chicago courts. But somewhere in Hawai’i there must be an honest judge that recognizes the damage being done to Hawai’i institutions by the continuing cover-up of a 50 year-old document of vital concern to American history.

Because I am traveling, faxes and e-mails reach me relatively promptly. Mailed letters will not. I would ask that you respond by fax or e-mail.

Please reply at your earliest convenience. I am in the process of preparing the lawsuit to be filed during the week of April 26th.

I think your office, the interests of the people of Hawai’i, and the interests of the American people would be best served by turning over all of the redacted or withheld materials to me. Otherwise, you can turn them over to a court.

Sincerely yours,

ANDY MARTIN

AM:sp

Internet powerhouse Andy Martin seeks funds to open new Barack Obama research in Hawaii

Obama author, investigator and film producer Andy Martin is launching an appeal for financial support to open a new investigation into Barack Obama’s origins in Hawai’i. Martin plans to begin the inquiry on April 27th. Martin has become such a regular visitor to Honolulu one local paper labeled him a “resident.” “Barack Obama may be sitting in the White House,” Martin says, “but he is still a mystery man to the American people. His past remains unknown. He and his wife constantly spread disinformation to confuse us. He is truly a ‘Manchurian Candidate.’ We are asking Americans for donations to continue our Obama research and litigation in Honolulu.”

We need your financial support to continue our Obama investigations in Hawai’i

ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not
Politically Correct”

April 13, 2010

Dear Reader:

I am asking you to contribute to our exciting new Obama research project in Hawai’i. You can mail a check to our New York offices (P.O. Box 1851, New York, NY 10150-1851) or better still you can make an immediate online contribution at either http://www.boycotthawaii.com/ or http://www.committeeofonemilliontodefeatbarackobama.com/

We are launching a new Obama-book-to-the-White House promotion as part of our new Hawai’i investigation.

First let me remind you what we have already accomplished.

In October, 2008, we opened the first research investigation into Obama’s “roots” in Hawai’i. None of the media had ever examined Obama’s Hawai’i years until my team showed up. Much to my surprise, Obama diverted his campaign plane to Honolulu and arrived while I was there. We ended up costing Obama millions of votes in the presidential election. I was the first name on Barack Obama’s enemies list.

As a result of our Honolulu interviews we elevated the “Frank Marshall Davis-as-biological-father” question to the national stage. We filed the first and so far only lawsuit in Hawai'i to open to public inspection Hawai’i state archives on Obama.

In 2009 we produced the first and only movie on Obama’s Hawai’i years (check out the above web sites for a full series of videos including the film). Step by step we have tried to develop an accurate picture of Obama’s roots. It takes time, money and shoe leather to do all of this on-the-scene investigation.

We are now asking for your financial support to begin a new Hawai’i investigation on April 27th, Operation Aloha Obama IV.

Here’s how we plan to put your donation to work::

1. Continue the lawsuit to open Hawai’i archives on Obama (a motion being filed in court on April 14th follows this letter).

2. We are going to film new Hawai’i scenes for the movie on his years in Hawai’i.

3. We are going to continue the Frank Marshal Davis research.

4. We are going to lobby the Hawai’i legislature not to enact new Obama-friendly laws seeking to cover-up access to his past.

5. We may file a second blockbuster lawsuit in Honolulu challenging the political cover-up by Hawai’i officials.

The more you contribute, the more of the “Andy do” list we can accomplish.

And, to remind Barry Obama that the American people still have questions about his past, for every $50 you contribute to support our new Hawai’i investigation we will send an autographed copy of my book to Mr. Obama. If you donate $50 to support the Hawai’i project, we will send you a confirmation of delivery you can verify on the Internet, and we will send Obama an autographed copy of “Obama: the Man Behind the Mask.” If enough people contribute $50, the White House will be flooded with copies. They won't be able to say they couldn't find a copy to read.

So please be generous! We exist on volunteer efforts and contributions from ordinary citizens who are fed up with the media elites and the political class in Washington that elevated socialist Obama to the office of president.

Remember, if you would like to send Barry Obama an autographed copy of my book, donate $50 to the Hawai’i investigation and we’ll send him a copy.

Thanks for your support in the past, which has made all of our earlier successes possible. We want to keep working on your behalf, so please donate today. We have a travel reservation for April 27th that has to be confirmed by April 16th. So please donate now.

Best wishes,

Andy
-----------------------------
[begin motion]
ANDY MARTIN
Plaintiff Pro Se
P. O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-ANDY
Toll-free fax (866) 707-ANDY

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF HAWAII

CIVIL NO. 08-1-2147-10 BIA

ANDY MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

LINDA LINGLE, et al.,

Defendants.
________________________)

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD ON APPEAL

Plaintiff moves the Court to enter an order supplementing the record on appeal to the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”) with the attached materials.
1. Facts
A. This lawsuit concerns efforts to obtain access to the original, typewritten 1961 birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama. The birth certificate of a president of the United States is a priori an important public record. For reasons which defy logic, Hawai’i officials claim that Obama was born in Hawai’i (a view that Plaintiff accepts) but refuse to release or make available access to the original 1961 document. The 1961 birth certificate contains considerable information that is not otherwise available.
B. No reasonable lawyer in a reasonable and impartial court could argue that Obama is a private citizen entitled to the same privacy rights as an ordinary individual. The Hawai’i legislature never intended to shield presidents of the United States from public access to their birth records. Obama’s original documents are objects of intense historical and scholarly interest. Interestingly, the actual place of Obama’s birth remains undocumented: hospital(which one), name of doctor (unknown), place of birth (unknown). He is the only recent president whose birthplace remains a secret (see attached article). What is Obama hiding? And why is this Court aiding and abetting in making as farce of Hawaii’s role in history? The American people have a right to know.
C. The missing birth certificate of Barack Obama remains a matter of national interest, with a large minority of the public rejecting the incomplete documentation released by Hawai’i officials to date. Hawai’i officials have the original but refuse to release it, see attached. Web link: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/
2009/Jul/28/ln/hawaii907280345.html
2. Argument
A. Since this case was originally heard, Chiyome Fukino has continued to play cat-and-mouse with history, by claiming she has the “original” birth certification in her possession but she will not make it available to scholars and historians. http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/
2009/Jul/28/ln/hawaii907280345.html
B. Fukino’s position is fundamentally and facially absurd, and brings both this Court and the government of the State of Hawai’i into ridicule. Plaintiff has attempted with the utmost respect and good faith to litigate in this court, and has seen some of the worse “outsider” hostility and lack of professionalism he has ever encountered in any public interest lawsuit.
C. Plaintiff asks this Court, due to the delay in processing the appeal and due to Fukino’s continuing series of public statements, to supplement the record on appeal with the attached materials which include Fukino’s own remarks of July 27, 2009. Fukino’s 2009 statement would probably allow plaintiff to file a law lawsuit based on Fukino’s new statements since 2008. However, Plaintiff would like to avoid a multiplicity of lawsuits and believes that the entire controversy should be heard in one appeal before the ICA. Therefore, Plaintiff asks that the attached materials be made part of the record on appeal.
Respectfully submitted
ANDY MARTIN
P.O. Box 1851
New York, NY 10150-1851
Toll-free tel. (866) 706-ANDY
Toll-free fax (866) 707-ANDY
E-mail (text only): AndyMart20@aol.com


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify I have served the Hawai’i Attorney General, 465 S. King Street, Suite 200, Honolulu, HI 96813 with this motion via fax to (808) 587-3077 on April 12, 2010.

ANDY MARTIN

[end motion]
-----------------------------
URGENT APPEAL: The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama raises money to oppose President Barack Obama's radical agenda and also to support www.BoycottHawaii.com. www.CommitteeofOneMilliontoDefeatBarackObama.com
Please give generously. Our ability to fight and defeat Barack Obama's political agenda is directly dependent on the generosity of every American. “The Committee of One Million to Defeat Barack Obama has no bundlers, no fat cats and no illegal contributions. Obama is opposed to almost everything America stands for," says Executive Director Andy Martin. "But while Obama has raised a billion dollar slush fund, his opponents lack sufficient resources. Americans can either contribute now, or pay later. If we do not succeed, Obama will."
------------------------------
Readers of Obama: The Man Behind The Mask, say the book is still the only gold standard and practical handbook on Barack Obama's unfitness for the presidency. Buy it. Book orders: Amazon.com or OrangeStatePress.com. Immediate shipment from Amazon.com or signed copies (delayed for signing) from the publisher are available.
------------------------------
Andy Martin is a legendary Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of broadcasting background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He is currently promoting his best-selling book, Obama: The Man Behind The Mask and promoting his new Internet movie “Obama: The Hawai’i years.” Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Martin comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York.

UPDATES:
www.Twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

His columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com;
contrariancommentary.typepad.com.
[NOTE: We try to correct typographical errors and additions/subtractions on our blogs, where you can find the latest edition of this column.]

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com
© Copyright by Andy Martin 2010