Andy Martin: Contrarian Commentary

My Photo
Name:
Location: Manchester, New Hampshire, United States

Friday, May 05, 2017

Obama author and expert Andy Martin says the new biography of President Barack Obama by liberal icon David Garrow will trigger a massive new inquiry into whether Obama was/is gay

NEW S FROM:
                                                                                          
ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin,  J. D.
adjunct professor of law
executive editor
one of America’s most respected
independent authors/investigators

“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”

you can call Andy:
National (866) 706-2639
Cell (917) 664-9329

you can email Andy:
AndyNewHampshire@aol.com

you can write Andy by
faxing (866) 214-3210

Blogs/web sites  (partial):
ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com
ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com
ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line.

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email, with proper attribution

Please sign up for our enhanced Twitter feed with enhanced, original coverage

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Attention, New York, Washington, National daybook/assignment and Political editors

Announcement of New York news conference Friday, May 5, 2017

Andy Martin says David Garrow’s new biography of President Barack Obama is going to create a firestorm of inquiry over whether Obama is actually a homosexual

Andy was the first author/researcher to brand Obama’s life story an “invented” family history and to expose Obama’s lies about his life in Chicago

Andy candidly admits he never saw sufficient credible evidence to write that Obama was gay/homosexual, but Garrow may have provided the “missing link” to a number of gaps in Obama’s résumé

“Garrow may have stumbled on the ‘missing ink’ that explains Obama’s obsession with sexuality,” Andy says, “from filling the courts with homosexual judges to demanding that schools create unisex toilets for transgender students to being obsessed with ‘rape’ on college campuses”

Andy says that because David Garrow is a member of the liberal establishment, doors may have been opened for him that were closed to conservative authors and researchers

Is Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel at risk?

(New York, NY) (May 5, 2017) Andy Martin, who wrote the first exposés about Barack Obama in 2004-2007, will hold a New York news conference today, May 5th, to claim that a new biography of President Barack Obama is going to trigger a firestorm of inquiry over Obama’s true sexuality and sexual orientation.

Andy’s remarks:

1. We have just scratched the surface in understanding Obama

“Barack Obama changed my life,” Andy says. “In 2004 I wrote what I thought would be a ‘one off’ exposing Obama’s bogus biography and invented family history. I ended up going to Hawai’i many times, being “investigated on the front page of the New York Tines as one of the most important stories of the 2008 presidential campaign, and becoming a focus of a Fox News Channel program hosted by Sean Hannity (please see link #1).

2. Some thoughts about sexuality and homosexuality

“If you believe what Obama wrote to his girlfriend about ‘considering’ a homosexual encounter, in David Garrow’s new book (see links [1][2] below), you will be buying into more Obamabaloney. I am not an expert on homosexuality but from what I have read most homosexuals have early inclinations that they are gay or lesbian. A person doesn’t get to college and have no idea about their sexuality. Moreover, a heterosexual person doesn’t usually ‘consider’ becoming homosexual. Obama’s explanations to his girl friend were self-serving and were probably intended to cover his tracks and his past sexual dalliances.

“When I went to the University of Illinois I was placed in an honors section for rhetoric. I spent a year with Professor Herbert Bogart studying human sexuality and all of its literary and analytical permutations, in a class full of sexually repressed honors students. (Bogart probably saved my life, because I learned more about sexuality in his class than I did in any military science course, which proved helpful overseas.)

“While I respect that sexuality reflects a continuum of levels from fully gay to fully heterosexual, Obama’s profession that he ‘considered’ homosexual activity, and that homosexuality was less challenging than a heterosexual relationship, is pure Obamabaloney. If there is one issue that most scholars agree on it is that living in a homosexual relationship, particularly in the 1980’s, was much more challenging (in the age of AIDS) than an ordinary heterosexual relationship between a man and a woman.

“Once again, Obama’s facts do not line up with either reality or clinical experience, and he appears to be admitting the precise opposite of what he is relating as his inclinations. Even then he was covering his tracks and leaving behind false clues.

3. The “compartmentalization” of abused children

“As we read liberal icon David Garrow’s massive book many will wonder ‘how was Barack Obama able to compartmentalize his sexuality and ambition until he was able to reach the White House?’ My theory, which I first offered in 2007 in a psychological profile of the presidential candidate, is that we have to understand Obama’s behavior in the context of analyzing the psyche of an abused child.

“Abused children become masters of compartmentalization. They have to endure unspeakable emotional and physical abuse, but still function normally in the ordinary, daily community. I have always believed that Obama was abused, emotionally and psychologically, and that he responded to his feelings of confusion, abandonment and abuse by compartmentalizing himself and his emotions and behavior. Garrow confirms my 2007 hypothesis.

4. 2007-2008 rumors concerning Obama’s homosexuality

“During 2007-2008 I was given source materials from people who claimed to have had a homosexual relationship with Obama. I refused to use the ‘homosexual’ material because there was no extrinsic evidence to verify the encounters. And I came under criticism and attacks on the Internet because I refused to address the allegations of homosexuality. I am confident today, a decade later, I made the correct choice. Unlike others, I clearly labeled my facts and theories as facts and theories and distinguished between the two. Indeed, I irritated Obama and the Obama camp precisely because I refused to publish lies about the candidate. Unlike the work of other authors, all of the controversial material I originated about Obama’s family history turned out to be correct. I did not publish unverified allegations as facts unless I had independent evidence to support the claims.

“Which leaves one to wonder: when will the next shoe drop? There were endless ‘reports’ of a sexual relationship between Obama and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Could Emanuel be the next ‘victim’ of Garrow’s book? Writers and researchers are going to have to go back and review their notes and files; what did we miss that Garrow found? (I am heading back to Hawaii for new research.) What is there still left to find? I firmly believe there is much more we are going to learn about Barack Obama’s private life.

“Garrow has opened a can of worms for Obama’s admirers. Interestingly, none of the ‘mainstream’ media that have preliminarily reported on Garrow’s new book have mentioned Garrow’s explosive findings on Obama’s potential (or actual) homosexuality. The mainstream media protection racket covering up unflattering aspects of Obama’s personal life remains in full force.

5. Obama’s contrived his “blackness”/was his sexuality also contrived?

“One of the reasons Garrow digs deeply into one of Obama’s relationships is because Garrow probably saw for the first time how Obama was capable of contrivance and manipulation. Most people pursue nonmarital sexual encounters for the pure pleasure of the encounter. Obama moved from being a sexually active teenager to being obsessed in his 20’s with how his racial and sexual choices would affect his political future. Wow. What kind of mind and what kind of repressed psyche would you have to have to make sexual choices and romantic choices based on political ambition?

“Because of his smoothness and personability, Obama was someone who could have entered either white or black society on an even keel. Garrow mentions Chicago politicians I knew who made choices in their private lives that limited their public advancement; Obama chose advancement over personal satisfaction. That extreme level of self-denial may have prompted concerns as Garrow peeled back layer after layer of Obama’s manipulations and contrivances as Obama reached the threshold of becoming a public figure.

“We have to remember several pertinent aspects of Garrow’s status and stature. First, he was a member in good standing of the liberal establishment, giving him massive ‘cred’ as an Obama author. Second, people opened up to him and doors were opened on the assumption that Garrow was writing a sympathetic or even sycophantic biography. Conservatives would not receive similar access. Bottom line: writers have just begun to explore the many and massive ‘contrivances’ in Obama’s life. Garrow provides the first liberal-originated guide book.

6. Did Obama’s mother influence Barack’s confused sexuality?

“My colleague Jerry Corsi explored the sexual proclivities of Barack Obama’s mother. Corsi focused on the mother in a way that I did not. But let’s turn Corsi’s writing around 180 degrees. ‘Barry’ Obama, as he was then known, had to have known of his mother’s libertine sexuality. Could he have felt shamed by his mother’s casual sexual practices?

“As new research is conducted and new witnesses and sources appear, we are likely to find that part of Obama’s admittedly confused sexuality, and his admitted willingness to consider a homosexual lifestyle, may have been promoted by his distaste at observing his mother’s behavior. Corsi may have been correct in his reporting about the salacious behavior of Obama’s mother, but Corsi probably missed the true significance of the mother’s behavior: she left behind a sexually confused and vulnerable son.

7. What really happened at Occidental College?

“I have always been fascinated by the great gap in Obama’s college years: his time at Occidental College. Instinctively I knew there was a major story in the Occidental years but it was probably not a ‘political’ story, more likely some sort of ‘coming of age’ situation. Garrow, I believe, has provided the ‘missing link’ that is going to unleash a torrent of new research on Obama’s past. Occidental was an elite, expensive private college. How did Obama, a self-confessed mediocre student at Punahou School in Honolulu, finance his education there? I have wondered for over a decade what the answer to that question would be.

“Ultimately, the tortured ‘relationship’ between Obama and Professor Lawrence Goldyn may provide the ultimate missing link. The two men did indeed have a relationship. Obama admits he was ‘experimenting’ during his time at Occidental. Why wouldn’t he have experimented with Goldyn? Obama may have felt a need to leave Occidental to avoid further and deeper involvement with Goldyn. Goldyn may be the ‘Rosebud’ link which explains why Obama left Occidental and moved on to relative anonymity at Columbia University in New York.

8. Obama’s obsession with sexuality during his presidency

“As I watched Barack Obama become President Obama I was amazed at his relentless and repeated obsession with controversial sexual issues. Time and time again, Obama focused on sexuality when it was counterproductive to do so. In his final year in office, Obama triggered a national controversy over transgender individuals and how to deal with their bathroom needs. Obama had to know the ‘bathroom bills’ would become a distraction and even hurt Hillary Clinton, but he persevered.

“Obama filled the federal courts with gay men and lesbians, to the point where it became obvious. While packing the courts with gays and lesbians never became as controversial as the bathroom bills and diktats, throughout his presidency Obama was obsessed with peripheral sexual issues. Why? Perhaps Garrow has provided an answer. At least he has pointed the way to further inquiry.

9. Are Barack Obama and Michele Obama BFFs?

“Garrow’s book is likely to focus attention on the real nature of the relationship between Barack Obama and Michele Obama. Is theirs a ‘marriage of convenience?’ Are they ‘best friends forever? (BFFs)’ Do Garrow’s disclosures about Obama’s tortured sexuality call into question whether Michele Robinson Obama may have been just another pawn or ‘tool’ in Obama’s relentless rise to national prominence?

“All of these questions will come under renewed focus in the coming days. Garrow has blown open the secure ‘safe’ where the reality of Barack Obama’s personality and sexuality have remained hidden for decades,” Andy concludes. “I have been working on a second book, ‘The Search for Obama,’ as well as a book on President Trump. Garrow has now provided a road map to many new areas of inquiry concerning the mysterious Mr. Obama.”

May 5th New York news conference details:

Who:                                                      

Obama author and expert Andy Martin

What:

Andy Martin says a new biography of President Barack Obama by liberal icon David Garrow will trigger a firestorm of inquiry into whether Obama is a homosexual

Where:

909 Third Avenue, public sidewalk in front of FDR Station Post Office entrance, New York (under the “909” canopy in case of rain)

When:

Friday, May 5, 2017; 12:00 P.M.

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]


[2]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4470550/President-Obama-considered-pursuing-gay-relationship.html

[3]

http://coed.com/2017/05/03/barack-obama-pursue-gay-relationship-with-professor-lawrence-goldwyn-david-garrow-biography/

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-nine years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over fifty years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

----------


© Copyright by Andy Martin 2017 – All Rights Reserved

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

The leftist/Democratic Party War Against Fox News: constitutional expert and media critic Andy Martin explains why free speech is endangered

NEWS FROM:
                                                                                          
ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin,  J. D.
adjunct professor of law
executive editor
one of America’s most respected
independent authors/investigators

“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”

you can call Andy:
National (866) 706-2639
Cell (917) 664-9329

you can email Andy:
AndyNewHampshire@aol.com

you can write Andy by
faxing (866) 214-3210

Blogs/web sites  (partial):
ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com
ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com
ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to andynewhampshire@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line.

Please feel free to forward and/or post this email, with proper attribution

Please sign up for our enhanced Twitter feed with enhanced, original coverage

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Andy Martin defends Fox News against attacks from Democrats and leftist extremists

Andy says he had a bad experience with Fox, where they abused him and stabbed him in the back but, as a matter of constitutional principle, he still defends the network

Andy says we cannot return to the social mores and practices of the 1950’s and 60’s; society has moved on

Andy also says Bill O’Reilly got a raw deal from Rupert Murdoch’s sons, who are in the process of dismembering Fox News; allegations of “sexual harassment” are only the visible aspects of a clandestine agenda to neuter the conservative network

Andy says Sean Hannity is only the latest victim of what is going to be a protracted “War Against Fox News”

(New York, NY) (April 25 2017)

Dear American:

Sixty-five years ago U. S. Senator Joe McCarthy terrorized the media and liberals in general by accusing them of being infiltrated by “communists.” McCarthy’s supporters tried to remove individuals and reporters from appearing on TV and radio, and threatened media that refused to bend to their demands. They also used pressure tactics against advertisers, many of whom quickly caved.

When CBS refused to be intimidated, the network became a liberal icon for staring down and standing up to McCarthy’s accusations.

Today the tables are reversed.

Liberals are trying to intimidate the media and seeking to force the removal of conservative voices by threatening boycotts against sponsors. A demonization campaign again Fox News host Bill O’Reilly, based on stale accusations of sexual harassment, caused the sons of Rupert Murdoch to panic and remove O’Reilly.

As I made clear in my earlier column on O’Reilly, I strongly oppose sexual harassment and condemn abusive behavior by men or women seeking to extort sexual favors based on their positions of corporate or media authority. Almost fifty years ago I stood up at the Federal Communications Commission for the equal employment rights of women.

But I believe Murdoch’s sons are hell bent on destroying the legacy of their father. Rupert Murdoch was a swashbuckling and often abrasive corporate operator who built a worldwide media empire. I have followed him since the 1970’s. Rupert was “good” and “bad” and “in between.” His own moral behavior was immoral.

But in 1996 he gave conservatives a voice in the United States, the Fox News Network, conceived by Roger Ailes. Murdoch’s sons have not built anything; they are destroying their father’s legacy and trying to dismember Fox News as a conservative voice. O’Reilly was only the first casualty.

O’Reilly became a victim of McCarthyism of the left, liberals using the same sorts of malignant tactics they had condemned when they were employed by Senator McCarthy in the 1950’s. Instead of “doing a CBS” and standing up for O’Reilly, the Murdoch boys panicked at the first sign of sponsor resistance. I don’t know what O’Reilly did or didn’t do with the various women who accused him. They said he had engaged in boorish behavior; no one ever said O’Reilly attacked them or physically manhandled them. If the allegations were proven, they were still stale, long out of date and stretching back a decade in some instances, during an era when standards of corporate behavior were steadily strengthened to condemn aggressive behavior.

Some form of discipline against O’Reilly may have been appropriate; dismissal was not. But I knew the attacks on O’Reilly were only the first stage in a liberal/leftist plan to destroy Fox News. I said to myself, “How long before Sean Hannity is next?” I didn’t have long to wait. Over the weekend a woman surfaced and denounced Hannity.

I have to be honest and state that while I have no hesitation to defend Fox News, I was treated badly by the network. They took advantage of my research, used me as a guest, and then smeared me when I became the target of leftist attacks (sound familiar?). Rupert Murdoch and his minions have no loyalty to anyone but themselves. Hannity stood by silently and failed to defend me, so his defense of free speech ends where his paycheck begins. But despite my own personal experience with Fox, I see an important constitutional principle in the way the network has been targeted for destruction by leftist activists and agitators.

Democrats are in a bind. They lost an election for the White House to someone they considered a clown. Congress is in the hands of Republicans, especially conservatives. In the days ahead, Democratic cities are going to lose massive amounts of federal funding as they persist in the nonsense that they are “sanctuary cities” free to defy federal law. And so Democrats have chosen to try to win with the media some sense of power that they have not been able to obtain from voters.

“The media” are only too happy to accommodate Democrats/leftists, because the media are marbled with liberals and extreme leftists. And so we have the War Against Fox News, breathlessly covered by also-ran competitors CNN and MSNBC.

Hannity has denounced his accuser and says he has assembled a powerful legal team to fight back against false accusations. Hannity’s accuser has already walked back her claims and says they do not amount to sexual harassment (please see links [1] and [2] below). Where does all of this end?

When I went to college in the 1960’s, men and women could only meet on the first floor of dorms, with three feet on the floor. Later, doors had to be open when a male visitor was on the floor a women’s dorm. Within a few years, everything was topsy turvy and social morals had radically changed. Are we about to return to the moral standards and practices of the 1950’s? I hope not.

Women have made unbelievable strides in the workplace in the past decades. Will businessmen and businesswomen only be able to meet in glass rooms?

I don’t think sexual harassment is a joke. I take it seriously. Ironically I went to Capitol Hill, initially as an intern, soon after “sex” had been added --as a joke-- to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Over a lifetime I have seen the progress women have made. I also grew up in a single-parent home where we depended on mom’s paycheck from “The Aircraft” every two weeks.

But we need to distinguish between genuine workplace harassment and the types of accusations that were hurled against O’Reilly and are now being asserted against Hannity. How can anyone distinguish fact from fiction years later, when two adults met alone? And, when sexual accusations are proffered as part of a coordinated campaign against a news organization to destroy that entity, are we are straight back in the 1950’s, with leftists now using the same tactics they condemned when Joe McCarthy was terrorizing America and abusing public figures?

Fox News is not a sympathetic organization, as I know from personal experience and the manner in which they abused me. But I have no hesitation to defend Fox from a campaign to destroy conservative speech and free speech in America. The left lost the 2016 election. Democrats are trying to win back on TV what they lost on the political battlefield. We can’t let them do that. Attention must be paid.

Andy

LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

[1]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/sean-hannity-calls-sexual-harassment-accusation-100percent-false/2017/04/24/f2432c90-28e7-11e7-9081-f5405f56d3e4_story.html?

[2]

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/sean-hannity-denies-right-wing-blogger-s-sex-harassment-claim-n750211

ANDY MARTIN - A BRIEF BIO:

Andy Martin is a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. With forty-nine years of background in radio and television and with five decades of investigative and analytical experience in Washington, the USA and around the world, Andy provides insight on politics, foreign policy, intelligence and military matters. For a full bio, go to: www.AndyMartin.com; also see www.BoycottABC.com/executive_director.htm

Andy has also been a leading corruption fighter in American politics and courts for over fifty years and is executive director of the National Anti-Corruption Policy Institute. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com.

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and produced the Internet film “Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” blogging at www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com and www.ContrarianCommentary.com.

Andy’s family immigrated to Manchester, New Hampshire 100 years ago; today his home overlooks the Merrimack River and he lives around the corner from where he played as a small boy. He is New Hampshire’s leading corruption fighter and Republican Party reformer.

UPDATES:

www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy’s columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

----------


© Copyright by Andy Martin 2017 – All Rights Reserved

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Did Barack Obama try to discredit foreign policy expert Andy Martin who blew the whistle on Benghazi-gate?



Republican foreign policy expert and New Hampshire corruption-fighter Andy Martin “blew the whistle” on Benghazi-gate on September 12th. Before anyone else in government or politics would come to Governor Mitt Romney’s defense, Andy Martin stood up and stood out and defended Romney’s criticism of the Obama regime. While “Washington Republicans” were undermining Romney, Andy Martin stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the governor. On September 12th Andy predicted that “Obama’s foreign policy collapse is now the paramount reason to remove him from the White House.” In response, President Obama’s lackeys may have used The Associated Press to counterattack and discredit Andy. The effort backfired. The record documents that Andy Martin was the first analyst to recognize both the military significance and the political significance the “Benghazi-gate” attacks would play in the presidential campaign.


NEWS FROM:                                                                     

Romney’s Rangers

Andy Martin
Executive Director

www.AndyMartin.com

you can call Andy:
 (603) 518-7310

you can email Andy:
andynewhampshire@aol.com

you can write Andy at:
fax (866) 707-2639

Blogs (partial):
ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com
ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com
ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com
Andymartinusa.posterous.com

To become a regular subscriber to our emails please send an email to AndyMart20@aol.com and place “SUBSCRIBE” in the subject line.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Republican Party foreign policy expert and New Hampshire corruption-fighter Andy Martin was first to analyze and disclose the significance of Benghazi-gate – on September 12th

Andy was and is a strong supporter of Governor Mitt Romney

Andy says President Obama’s operatives may have tried to use The Associated Press to undermine and discredit Andy’s prescient commentary on Benghazi-gate

(Manchester, NH) (October 14, 2012) Republican Party foreign policy expert and New Hampshire activist Andy Martin was the first foreign policy analyst to defend Governor Mitt Romney and to disclose the domestic political impact of the September 11th attacks on the U. S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. His views:

I. The long history of conflict between Barack and Andy

In 2004 I wrote the first disclosure that Barack Obama’s “autobiography” was mostly fiction. I asked the publisher to put Obama’s book on the “fiction” shelves, not the biography section. Obama was very irritated that I had scored a bull’s eye on his credibility. During the 2008 presidential campaign I disclosed major new aspects of Obama’s “hidden history,” culminating in a national appearance on “Sean Hannity’s America” where I accused Obama of being a “socialist” (link below). I was the first independent investigator to go to Hawai’i to dig for the truth about Obama; what I discovered there has increasingly become accepted doctrine in the conservative community. The Obama campaign took notice of my criticism.

II. Obama’s long history of attempts to discredit Andy Martin

Obama’s initial retaliation against me took the form of cyber attacks. Later, in October, 2008 Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs went on “Hannity and Colmes” and accused Hannity of being an “anti-Semite” because Hannity had me as a guest on his program (despite George Soros’ relentless attacks on Hannity and me, neither I nor Hannity are anti-Semites; Gibbs’ attack was just another diversionary attack). Obama assets later attacked me in New Hampshire. On September 19th, 2012 Obama & Company may have used The Associated Press to discredit my exposure of Benghazi-gate and my prediction that the murder of American diplomats would doom Obama’s reelection.

Take a look at the facts and look closely at the time-line. Then you be the judge.

III. Andy Martin’s chilling predictions on September 5th

On September 5th I filed a column (links below) accusing Hillary Clinton of “undermining the war on terror” and calling for her resignation. I made my accusation during the same period when Clinton was denying adequate security to her diplomatic staff in Libya. I outlined how Hillary Clinton’s loyalty to the “Clinton Global Initiative” created a conflict with U. S. security interests overseas.

In retrospect, my claim that I sometimes “see over the horizon before our own diplomats do” proved to be tragically accurate a week later.

IV. Andy Martin comes to the defense of Mitt Romney

On September 11th Al Qaeda associates launched a terrorist attack on the U. S. Consulate in Benghazi. The liberal media immediately attacked Governor Mitt Romney for his criticism of the Obama administration’s response to the earlier Cairo "video" demonstrations. Obama & Co., through their media parrots, accused Romney or “undermining” foreign policy. I vigorously defended Romney and said that Benghazi-gate would “doom President Obama to reelection defeat” (links below; read the entire story). I expressly defended Romney against attacks by “Washington Republicans.” I further predicted “Obama's foreign failures are coming crashing down on him just as he runs for reelection at home.”

I focused on the seriousness of the Benghazi attack long before anyone else would step up to defend Governor Romney. Belatedly, everyone is now supporting Romney. But on September 12th Republicans were wringing their hands at Romney's honesty and his forthright criticism of Obama's failed foreign “apology policy.” I defended the governor before it was safe and popular to do so. And I also provided the “first look” into both the political and diplomatic significance of Benghazi-gate.

IV. The Associated Press attempts to undermine Andy Martin

As though acting on cue for the Obama administration, on September 19th The Associated Press mysteriously ran a national story which appeared on every major web site in the United States calling me a “legend in my own mind” and referring to me as a “self-proclaimed Republican foreign policy expert.” There was nothing whatsoever that I had done to justify a national story. The Associated Press distributes stories locally, regionally or nationally based on their importance; a national or “A-Wire” story carries national importance.

What had I done to justify national attention by AP? Well, in the AP’s snide words, “nothing.” I was an “imaginary” expert. Why would AP be covering an “imaginary” and “self-proclaimed” foreign policy analyst? Makes you wonder.

V. Why is Andy different from “Washington Republicans” and liberal media “experts?”

I have not had a conventional career. I started out in politics, segued into political intelligence, was educated as a lawyer and became a foreign policy expert in dangerous places around the world (see listing below). I have a track record of accurate analysis. The liberal media’s “experts” do not. You can check my predictions going back to Iraq in 2003. My views were not popular then. I predicted the ultimate failure of the invasion.

I am a “classic conservative” critic, which means I take a conservative view of life. I am not a conservative weenie who swallows the conservative party line without question. So, instead of having “one” career, I have had several careers, sometimes simultaneously. And, my multiple experiences all provide me with a multi-dimensional or polymathic perspective on each new challenge. That’s why I claim to occasionally “see over the horizon.” Been there, done that.

VI. Andy against exposes Obama’s chaos in the Middle East

On September 23rd I again analyzed the growing chaos in Obama’s foreign policy (links blow), calling the “Libya-video” story a “canard” and again calling for Hillary Clinton’s resignation. Here is part of what I said on September 23rd:

“With every passing day the Benghazi disaster and the murder of our ambassador becomes the most serious foreign policy fiasco since Jimmy Carter’s Iran hostage crisis. Hillary Clinton has appointed a ‘committee’ to study her own incompetence. Wow.

“Obama’s U. N. ambassador claimed the Libya attack was due to a ‘video.’ Obama’s news secretary repeated the ‘video’ canard. President Obama went on Univision and said he ‘didn’t have all the facts,’ which is a form of paranoid schizophrenic defense mechanism.

VII. The bottom line: Obama lied; Andy exposed the truth

In retrospect it all looks so orderly. I predicted on September 5th Clinton was “endangering” Americans. On September 12th I defended Mitt Romney after the consulate attack. On September 19th The Associated Press mysteriously published a national story saying I was an imaginary expert and specifically referencing my own news story of September 12. On September 23rd I made new predictions which have been validated by subsequent events.

I am writing this column for two reasons: First, I would like to defend my own national security and foreign policy credentials as compared with those of other media that lack my experience in the real world. Second, the events of the past month reflect how the national media relentlessly seek to discredit and undermine critics of President Obama by ridiculing their qualifications and experience. Maybe that’s why Barack Obama’s own operatives have been using the media to attack me for the past several years. They are afraid of the truth, and they are afraid of me. You be the judge. (This should be the end of the story.)

OK, a column based on accurate predictions should make another prediction. Lawyers have an old rubric about clients that don’t pay their bills. The saying goes, “Clients should never refuse to pay either their lawyers or their accountants. They could run into “problems.” Here’s the prediction: Presidents and vice presidents should never dump on their diplomats and intelligence agencies. They could run into “problems.” Obama’s attempt to blame the clandestine services for his own failures in Libya will boomerang and backfire.

[Andy has over forty years of familiarity with Asia and the Middle East; he is regarded overseas as one of America’s most respected independent foreign policy, military and intelligence analysts. His analysis of the terrorist threat in Iran during the 1979-80 hostage crisis, and again in Iraq in 2003, were leading-edge predictions of what Americans faced in the future.

Andy first went to Asia in 1967 and since then he has been in Israel, Jordan, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Viet-Nam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand, Burma and Hong Kong. He was in Iran and Afghanistan in 1979-80, and has regularly returned to Southwest Asia since then. He lived in Iraq in 2003.]

--------------------------

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639; CELL (917) 664-9329
E-
MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com

ujntsman wasd reelected in November, 2008. A few monrths later he resigned to serve
his president,” Barack Obama. SDo whyh was it so terrible that Palin resigned and Hutsman served evenless of his secondterm? Can I say “double standard” again.

What os this show us? Whetyher thessue s resigfnaitonsor religion,th emedia shamlessly create double standards tgo favr theiiberal medioa pets (fulldisclosure; I am ot aliberalmedia pet).
--------------------------
Please Donate:
You can help support our independent Internet journalism by going to:
and making a contribution by mail or on line.

--------------------------
LINKS TO THIS STORY (cut and paste the entire link below and not just the underlined portion):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgjQhnDEGSk

andy-martin-says-r3361532.htm

foreign-policy-expert-andy-martin-says-bill-clintons-
conflicts-may-be-undermining-the-war-on-terror/

andy-martin-mitt-r3374591.htm

2012/09/12/foreign-policy-expert-andy-martin-
mitt-romney-is-right-to-criticize-obama/

colorful-past-politics-and-court

http://www.pr-inside.com/new-york-news-conference-foreign-policy-r3391697.htm

2012/09/23/new-york-news-conference-foreign-
policy-expert-andy-martin-predicted-growing-
risk-of-attacks-on-americans/

--------------------------

WHAT OTHERS SAY:

“Andy Martin is revolutionizing journalism… [Andy] brings to online journalism what Rush Limbaugh [brings] to radio or Michael Moore to film: sleek little stories that fit into larger political narratives…”

“The only American journalists that are “standing UP” [to Obama] are, Andy Martin…”

ABOUT ROMNEY’S RANGERS:

Romney’s Rangers is led by Andy Martin, a legendary New Hampshire, New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, talk television pioneer, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. Andy’s family immigrated to New Hampshire 100 years ago, where he now makes his home. Chicago Public Radio calls Andy a “boisterous Internet activist.” The Chicago Tribune calls him “Chicago’s own…political activist.” He has forty-four years of background in radio and television. He is the author of “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” [www.OrangeStatePress.com] and he produced the Internet film "Obama: The Hawaii’ Years” [www.BoycottHawaii.com]. Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on local, regional, national and international events with more than four decades of investigative and analytical experience both in the USA and around the world.

Andy has been a leading corruption fighter in New Hampshire, Illinois and American politics and courts for over forty-five years. [www.AndyMartin.com] He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com. See also www.FirstRespondersOnline.us; www.EnglishforAmerica.org

He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

UPDATES:
www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA
www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com ContrarianCommentary.wordpress.com
ContrarianCommentary.typepad.com
andymartinusa.posterous.com

[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in our stories; find the latest version on our blogs.]

--------------------------
© Copyright by Andy Martin 2012 – All Rights Reserved
--------------------------
 

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin says Barack Obama’s “brown shirts” are smearing Andy in light of a new Newsweek pool showing “faith” in Obama collapsing

Martin was the first person to offer a coherent timeline during the 2008 presidential campaign for Obama’s radical associations, on Sean Hannity’s America
ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

ANDY MARTIN SAYS HE CAN ALWAYS TELL WHEN THE LEFT IS SCARED; THEY START ATTACKING ANDY AGAIN

MARTIN SAYS THAT THE LEFT’S DESPERATION CAN BE SEEN FROM THE CONSTANT EFFORTS TO SMEAR ANDY BY DISTORTING HIS ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS THIRTY AND FORTY YEARS AGO

MARTIN SAYS THAT AS BETWEEN THE TORTOISE AND THE HARE, MARTIN IS SLOWLY BUT SURELY BESTING OBAMA

MARTIN IS EN ROUTE TO FLORIDA FOR A “WAR COUNCIL” OVER THE LABOR DAY WEEKEND TO PLAN THE DEFEAT OF BARACK OBAMA IN 2012


(NEW YORK)(September 1, 2010) ContrarianCommentary.com’s Executive Editor, Andy Martin, is coming under new attacks by Barack Obama’s leftist stooges as Obama continues to lose media approval and public support. Martin is en route to Florida for a “war council” to orchestrate the delegitimization and defeat of Obama in 2012.

“I think it was Adlai Stevenson,” Martin says, “who said ‘I’ll stop telling the truth about them when they stop telling lies about me.’ Well, they’re lying again.

“The latest smear is a rehash of a rehash of a smear job by the New York Times during the 2008 presidential campaign. Last spring I was attacked by the Washington Post’s resident slimeball, David Weigel, who misrepresented my views. We are gearing up to sue Mr. Weigel. Now another leftist stooge, Stephen Webster of RawStory.com, is attacking me as a retort to Obama’s collapsing poll numbers.

“Webster accuses me of spreading ‘rumors’ about Barack Obama. That’s simply a Big Fat Stalinist Lie. Everything I have written about Obama is true; no one can point to a single word of mine that Obama has impeached. In fact, other authors have used my writing as a starting point, retraced my steps and confirmed my original views.

“Obama uses his media thugs to attack me as a way to shore up his poll numbers. He is terrified I’m winning and he’s losing.

“We will have our column Thursday or Friday on why Obama is a Muslim. We keep reaffirming our research and analysis and we stick by what we wrote in 2004.

“Webster goes on to suggest that ‘Fox News gave me a shot at fame.’ I was famous before I appeared on Fox News; they asked me to be a guest because everyone’s research was based on my original scholarly work. To paraphrase ‘Sunset Boulevard,’ ‘I made Fox News, they didn’t make me.’

“Webster attacks me for my theory that Frank Marshall Davis is really Obama’s biological daddy. Obama has never denied that fact. And, since I do not have a blood test to prove my theory, I have carefully labeled my theory as a theory.

‘What is interesting is that Webster has probably not done any original, independent research into the facts and truth about Obama. I have actually been to Hawai’i and done original research there over three years. We produced the only film on Obama's Hawai’i years. It's on the Internet to be viewed.

“My movement is growing based on the facts and the truth about BHO. Obama is in decline because he is a liar and fraud. We are hoping to raise money to go back to Hawai'i in November. No other writer has done the extensive on-the-scene research I have in Chicago, Honolulu and New York. That is where my theory about Davis comes from.

“Webster, instead, uses the New York Times’ propaganda barrages against me as his journalistic snot rag. He can't do research so he merely regurgitates old lies.

“I am indeed controversial in our judicial system. I am exposing corruption constantly. Just last month I exposed a creepy judge in Springfield, Illinois who bought himself a judgeship, and kept making political contributions while sitting on a case involving his donees.

“I plead guilty to being unpopular in Illinois politics. But this is the same Illinois politics that once voted to condemn the late Senator Paul Simon as a traitor. I am in good company. I am not controversial because I am a bad guy in Illinois. I am one of the few good guys who has spent a career exposing petty and great corruption in our legal system.

“As a young law student at the University of Illinois College of Law, I incurred the wrath of the Illinois Supreme Court when I worked with reporters to expose two corrupt justices who were forced to resign from the Court.

“Then I exposed liberal icon John Paul Stevens as someone who had done shady business with the corrupt Illinois Democratic Party.

“I exposed Jose (‘call me Joe’) Cabranes, the ‘cocaine cowboy’ of the federal courts, who appeared to be so high in court he was flying off the bench. Cocaine Cabranes is no friend of mine. But President Bill Clinton looked at my evidence and rejected Cabranes for the Supreme Court.

“Can anyone else point to such a successful record of fighting corruption? I don’t think so.

“It is amazing how the left uses McCarthyism to attack me because I am Obama’s strongest and longest critic. They dredge up thirty and forty year-old news stories and then distort the facts to smear me, not because of what I did then, but because of what I am doing now.

“In the final analysis, being smeared by Barack Obama and his sleazy supporters is the ultimate compliment. He created a dirty tricks squad to attack me in 2008, and they continue to harass me. I must be a threat for 2012 or they would not be trying to minimize my impact. I exposed Obama as a Muslim six years ago. Stephen Webster, Newsweek and the mainstream media are forced to admit the American people believe me, not Obama.

“If I have to choose between the confidence of the American people and the confidence of the Weigels and Websters of this world, I am proud to say every day more and more Americans believe my research,” Martin says. “Obama can go and be the president of Kenya. He’s eligible there.”


-------------------------------------
ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin, who Chicago Public Radio calls a “boisterous Internet activist,” is the legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He promotes his best-selling book, “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” and his Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai'i years." Martin has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois for over forty years. He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com
Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of investigative and overseas experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

UPDATES: www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSAwww.facebook.com/AndyMartin Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com.
contrariancommentary.typepad.com[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in this story on our blogs; find our latest edition there.]

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com © Copyright by Andy Martin 2010

Labels: , , , , ,

Internet Powerhouse Andy Martin says Barack Obama’s “brown shirts” are smearing Andy in light of a new Newsweek pool showing “faith” in Obama collapsing

Martin was the first person to offer a coherent timeline during the 2008 presidential campaign for Obama’s radical associations, on Sean Hannity’s America

ContrarianCommentary.com
“The Internet Powerhouse”
Andy Martin
Executive Editor

“Factually Correct, Not Politically Correct”

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

ANDY MARTIN SAYS HE CAN ALWAYS TELL WHEN THE LEFT IS SCARED; THEY START ATTACKING ANDY AGAIN

MARTIN SAYS THAT THE LEFT’S DESPERATION CAN BE SEEN FROM THE CONSTANT EFFORTS TO SMEAR ANDY BY DISTORTING HIS ANTI-CORRUPTION EFFORTS THIRTY AND FORTY YEARS AGO

MARTIN SAYS THAT AS BETWEEN THE TORTOISE AND THE HARE, MARTIN IS SLOWLY BUT SURELY BESTING OBAMA

MARTIN IS EN ROUTE TO FLORIDA FOR A “WAR COUNCIL” OVER THE LABOR DAY WEEKEND TO PLAN THE DEFEAT OF BARACK OBAMA IN 2012


(NEW YORK)(September 1, 2010) ContrarianCommentary.com’s Executive Editor, Andy Martin, is coming under new attacks by Barack Obama’s leftist stooges as Obama continues to lose media approval and public support. Martin is en route to Florida for a “war council” to orchestrate the delegitimization and defeat of Obama in 2012.

“I think it was Adlai Stevenson,” Martin says, “who said ‘I’ll stop telling the truth about them when they stop telling lies about me.’ Well, they’re lying again.

“The latest smear is a rehash of a rehash of a smear job by the New York Times during the 2008 presidential campaign. Last spring I was attacked by the Washington Post’s resident slimeball, David Weigel, who misrepresented my views. We are gearing up to sue Mr. Weigel. Now another leftist stooge, Stephen Webster of RawStory.com, is attacking me as a retort to Obama’s collapsing poll numbers.

“Webster accuses me of spreading ‘rumors’ about Barack Obama. That’s simply a Big Fat Stalinist Lie. Everything I have written about Obama is true; no one can point to a single word of mine that Obama has impeached. In fact, other authors have used my writing as a starting point, retraced my steps and confirmed my original views.

“Obama uses his media thugs to attack me as a way to shore up his poll numbers. He is terrified I’m winning and he’s losing.

“We will have our column Thursday or Friday on why Obama is a Muslim. We keep reaffirming our research and analysis and we stick by what we wrote in 2004.

“Webster goes on to suggest that ‘Fox News gave me a shot at fame.’ I was famous before I appeared on Fox News; they asked me to be a guest because everyone’s research was based on my original scholarly work. To paraphrase ‘Sunset Boulevard,’ ‘I made Fox News, they didn’t make me.’

“Webster attacks me for my theory that Frank Marshall Davis is really Obama’s biological daddy. Obama has never denied that fact. And, since I do not have a blood test to prove my theory, I have carefully labeled my theory as a theory.

‘What is interesting is that Webster has probably not done any original, independent research into the facts and truth about Obama. I have actually been to Hawai’i and done original research there over three years. We produced the only film on Obama's Hawai’i years. It's on the Internet to be viewed.

“My movement is growing based on the facts and the truth about BHO. Obama is in decline because he is a liar and fraud. We are hoping to raise money to go back to Hawai'i in November. No other writer has done the extensive on-the-scene research I have in Chicago, Honolulu and New York. That is where my theory about Davis comes from.

“Webster, instead, uses the New York Times’ propaganda barrages against me as his journalistic snot rag. He can't do research so he merely regurgitates old lies.

“I am indeed controversial in our judicial system. I am exposing corruption constantly. Just last month I exposed a creepy judge in Springfield, Illinois who bought himself a judgeship, and kept making political contributions while sitting on a case involving his donees.

“I plead guilty to being unpopular in Illinois politics. But this is the same Illinois politics that once voted to condemn the late Senator Paul Simon as a traitor. I am in good company. I am not controversial because I am a bad guy in Illinois. I am one of the few good guys who has spent a career exposing petty and great corruption in our legal system.

“As a young law student at the University of Illinois College of Law, I incurred the wrath of the Illinois Supreme Court when I worked with reporters to expose two corrupt justices who were forced to resign from the Court.

“Then I exposed liberal icon John Paul Stevens as someone who had done shady business with the corrupt Illinois Democratic Party.

“I exposed Jose (‘call me Joe’) Cabranes, the ‘cocaine cowboy’ of the federal courts, who appeared to be so high in court he was flying off the bench. Cocaine Cabranes is no friend of mine. But President Bill Clinton looked at my evidence and rejected Cabranes for the Supreme Court.

“Can anyone else point to such a successful record of fighting corruption? I don’t think so.

“It is amazing how the left uses McCarthyism to attack me because I am Obama’s strongest and longest critic. They dredge up thirty and forty year-old news stories and then distort the facts to smear me, not because of what I did then, but because of what I am doing now.

“In the final analysis, being smeared by Barack Obama and his sleazy supporters is the ultimate compliment. He created a dirty tricks squad to attack me in 2008, and they continue to harass me. I must be a threat for 2012 or they would not be trying to minimize my impact. I exposed Obama as a Muslim six years ago. Stephen Webster, Newsweek and the mainstream media are forced to admit the American people believe me, not Obama.

“If I have to choose between the confidence of the American people and the confidence of the Weigels and Websters of this world, I am proud to say every day more and more Americans believe my research,” Martin says. “Obama can go and be the president of Kenya. He’s eligible there.”


-------------------------------------
ABOUT ANDY: Andy Martin, who Chicago Public Radio calls a “boisterous Internet activist,” is the legendary New York and Chicago-based muckraker, author, Internet columnist, radio talk show host, broadcaster and media critic. He has over forty years of background in radio and television and is the dean of Illinois media and communications. He promotes his best-selling book, “Obama: The Man Behind The Mask” and his Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai'i years." Martin has been a leading corruption fighter in Illinois for over forty years. He is currently sponsoring www.AmericaisReadyforReform.com
Andy is the Executive Editor and publisher of the “Internet Powerhouse,” www.ContrarianCommentary.com. He comments on regional, national and world events with more than four decades of investigative and overseas experience. He holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York (LaGuardia CC, Bronx CC).

UPDATES: www.twitter.com/AndyMartinUSAwww.facebook.com/AndyMartin Andy's columns are also posted at ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com; contrariancommentary.wordpress.com.
contrariancommentary.typepad.com[NOTE: We try to correct any typographical errors in this story on our blogs; find our latest edition there.]

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639 or CELL (917) 664-9329E-MAIL: AndyMart20@aol.com © Copyright by Andy Martin 2010

Labels: , , ,